Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2006 19:57:32 GMT
From TfL website....
NORTHERN LINE (EDGWARE BRANCH): Minor delays are occurring due to trespassers on the track earlier at Edgware.
Message received 7:14pm
Couldn't the trains be turned early at Brent Cross, thus minimising, or avoiding, any delays?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2006 20:17:00 GMT
The reversing siding is at Colindale. No doubt the 'minor' delays is in reference to the use of this siding.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2006 21:53:54 GMT
From TfL website.... NORTHERN LINE (EDGWARE BRANCH): Minor delays are occurring due to trespassers on the track earlier at Edgware. Message received 7:14pm Couldn't the trains be turned early at Brent Cross, thus minimising, or avoiding, any delays? Turning trains in a single reversing siding would effectively limit the frequency to every 6 minutes, compared to the service frequency at that time of day of approx 3 to 4.5mins. So minor delays would be occuring. There may also be issues with trains that would have been taken out of service post rush hour at Edgware having to find an alternative place to stay. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2006 22:50:20 GMT
No doubt this pleased the cattle!
|
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Apr 28, 2006 11:31:56 GMT
The cattle would be in a strop even if the train was going to edgware. no doubt a few reversed at golders green, or as the sexy announcer says golders greeeen. As for the trespassers, maybe they were trying to walk to mill hill east and thought the trackbed was still in situ.  |
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 30, 2006 17:33:50 GMT
This seems to be a recurring theme at the moment, the Central was suspended last night for trespassers at Loughton. I'm not sure what the attraction is! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 1, 2006 10:20:10 GMT
Better view for a start, as compared to the 92 stock, of which i am not a big fan. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2006 18:33:37 GMT
Better view for a start, as compared to the 92 stock, of which i am not a big fan. Ere!!! Hiow dare you impose that slur on wonderful 92 stock! Theres nothing wrong with them, apart from..... unreliable DTS/Train Management Computer, uncomfortable seats in the saloons, rubbishy air con, poor handling, silly door chimes, odd announcements, spurious messages on the DTS...... What else can I say??? |
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 1, 2006 18:36:37 GMT
Exactly mate! apart from that, they are lovely arent they!
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 1, 2006 19:31:28 GMT
Oh, and don't forget that they leak too! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2006 19:35:33 GMT
Oh, I'd forgotten why my tea has been tasing funny lately!
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 1, 2006 20:08:32 GMT
The depot trialled windscreen washers on 'C' Stock shortly after their refurb. They couldn't figure out why they never had to refill the bottles! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by mowat on May 2, 2006 12:18:56 GMT
Better view for a start, as compared to the 92 stock, of which i am not a big fan. Ere!!! Hiow dare you impose that slur on wonderful 92 stock! Theres nothing wrong with them, apart from..... unreliable DTS/Train Management Computer, uncomfortable seats in the saloons, rubbishy air con, poor handling, silly door chimes, odd announcements, spurious messages on the DTS...... What else can I say??? Bring back the 62 stock. ;D |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2006 16:21:40 GMT
Bring back the 62 stock. ;D Agreed. 100%. |
|
