|
|
Post by londonse on Jun 5, 2009 13:21:06 GMT
I have been doing some research and at the TNA I found reference to a connection under a platform the document did not mention the actual station anyone know anymore detail? Going by some of the people (Rail technician etc) I am hoping for a pointer in the right direction.
Paul
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 5, 2009 16:39:30 GMT
ADMIN:
I hope this makes sense to somebody: if there's no reply in a couple of days I'll delete it, because the post is far too vague as to what and where.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Jun 5, 2009 18:40:14 GMT
TNA being The National Archives, formerly the Public Records Office at Kew.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282 
|
Post by Ben on Jun 5, 2009 18:48:09 GMT
What kind of connection? A passage way or something?
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jun 5, 2009 18:48:28 GMT
Do you mean the movable platform at the original CLR Wood Lane station which allowed the conection into the depot?
|
|
|
|
Post by londonse on Jun 5, 2009 21:19:51 GMT
ADMIN:I hope this makes sense to somebody: if there's no reply in a couple of days I'll delete it, because the post is far too vague as to what and where. Phil, I only put what was in the TNA file it only mentioned Bakerloo. Paul |
|
|
|
Post by londonse on Jun 5, 2009 21:20:32 GMT
What kind of connection? A passage way or something? I'm sorry it only said connection under platform. |
|
|
|
Post by londonse on Jun 5, 2009 21:21:30 GMT
Do you mean the movable platform at the original CLR Wood Lane station which allowed the conection into the depot? Nothing to do with Central line unless the TNA file is wrong. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2009 21:32:31 GMT
As some sort of clue, what archive file was this in, and what was the context of the 'connection' reference?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 5, 2009 22:52:28 GMT
As some sort of clue, what archive file was this in, and what was the context of the 'connection' reference? MT6 or MT51? |
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Jun 5, 2009 23:18:59 GMT
Could this have something to do with the reconstruction of either Baker St or Trafalgar Square in the 70s--coinciding with the introduction of the Jubilee line?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2009 4:34:28 GMT
Maybe so the rats could move around more easily? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by londonse on Jun 8, 2009 1:41:55 GMT
As some sort of clue, what archive file was this in, and what was the context of the 'connection' reference? MT6 or MT51? CAB file |
|
|
|
Post by londonse on Jun 8, 2009 1:43:40 GMT
Could this have something to do with the reconstruction of either Baker St or Trafalgar Square in the 70s--coinciding with the introduction of the Jubilee line? Don't think it's 1970s as the file was to do with facilities/communications. |
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 8, 2009 16:55:15 GMT
Are not the CAB files Cabinet - ie Government files?
|
|
|
|
Post by upfast on Jun 8, 2009 16:58:48 GMT
Are not the CAB files Cabinet - ie Government files? They'd probably delete themselves in a few days then      |
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 8, 2009 17:10:44 GMT
;D
Well; I think that the file could be referring to (Sh! Sh! Sh!) the large (secretish) underground (even more secretish) telephone exchanges. A trawl of SUBBRIT would probably provide some answers, although I can't remember exactly where - akin to GUARDIAN exchange in Manchester.
|
|
