Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2015 17:13:40 GMT
This afternoon 17/5/15 i noticed that the Northern line Bank branch was suspended Northbound I believe due to a person on the track now my question is how did this person? Get onto the track if the line is single bore tube tunnel.
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Jul 13, 2015 17:22:18 GMT
This afternoon 17/5/15 i noticed that the Northern line Bank branch was suspended Northbound I believe due to a person on the track now my question is how did this person? Get onto the track if the line is single bore tube tunnel. I'd assume they climbed or fell off a station platform.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jul 13, 2015 20:00:56 GMT
They use "person on the track" as an alternative to "person under a train."
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Jul 13, 2015 22:52:27 GMT
They use "person on the track" as an alternative to "person under a train." That is a nice euphemism which makes passengers almost feel thankful that the trains were stopped, as (even though the delay will be a nuisance, to put it mildly,) no-one wants to see someone hit by a train. Simon
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jul 13, 2015 23:19:47 GMT
This afternoon 17/5/15 i noticed that the Northern line Bank branch was suspended Northbound I believe due to a person on the track now my question is how did this person? Get onto the track if the line is single bore tube tunnel. It was a (particularly messy) one under in the platform area at Angel. The words 'person under train' are not broadcast nowadays as there is some evidence of copycat behaviour. Personally I'd prefer to use 'customer incident' which is more vague and covers a range of possibilities, as I think person on track is confusing all round, but perhaps still suggests one under to some - for example today's Angel incident closely followed one at Victoria earlier in the day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2015 1:14:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jul 14, 2015 6:38:01 GMT
They use "person on the track" as an alternative to "person under a train." That is a nice euphemism which makes passengers almost feel thankful that the trains were stopped, as (even though the delay will be a nuisance, to put it mildly,) no-one wants to see someone hit by a train. A person under a train has not necessarily been hit by it. On the contrary, when I was the "person under a train" (and indeed "on the track") it would be more accurate to say that I had hit the train, which was standing in the platform when I tripped and fell under it, and remained there until they fished me out.
|
|