Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,198 
|
Post by Tom on Dec 13, 2015 18:20:17 GMT
I've recently acquired a number plate reading RFNX 265B.
From that I obviously know what line, but the 200 series of Auto signal numbers was confined to the stretch north of Finchley Central on the Northern line, and there were no floodgates in that area!
Doe anyone know if there was a change in the numbering used during one of the auto section resignallings, and if so where this plate came from?
|
|
|
|
Post by programmes1 on Dec 13, 2015 19:09:07 GMT
I've recently acquired a number plate reading RFNX 265 B. From that I obviously know what line, but the 200 series of Auto signal numbers was confined to the stretch north of Finchley Central on the Northern line, and there were no floodgates in that area! Doe anyone know if there was a change in the numbering used during one of the auto section resignallings, and if so where this plate came from? Tom, SB Waterloo repeater for the intermediate home signal. |
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Dec 13, 2015 22:00:54 GMT
I've recently acquired a number plate reading RFNX 265 B. From that I obviously know what line, but the 200 series of Auto signal numbers was confined to the stretch north of Finchley Central on the Northern line, and there were no floodgates in that area! Doe anyone know if there was a change in the numbering used during one of the auto section resignallings, and if so where this plate came from? The original 200s series included the Charing Cross branch, and the original branch as far as Archway. A couple of relics survived until TBTC, for example E.233 and E.234 at Camden Town. The automatic signalling between Strand and Kennington was modernised October 1976, so that's almost certainly when the number was changed. I presume it's not one of the ones which is square(ish) and with a black border? Being a floodgate signal, if my understanding is right it would be too 'modern' for that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2015 22:14:09 GMT
RFNX265B (and other such related signals) was commissioned 17/12/39 when the floodgates were commissioned in the area.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2015 22:17:54 GMT
RFNX265B (and other such related signals) was commissioned 17/12/39 when the floodgates were commissioned in the area. Strand - Kennington SB was further resignalled 24/10/76 which matches North End's info. |
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,198
|
Post by Tom on Dec 14, 2015 10:39:03 GMT
That's great, thanks everyone.
It also explains the revision 'J' on drawing BS.14381 which refers to Northern line duplications being removed in 1976.
|
|
