Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 19:34:09 GMT
During this weekends engineering works on the H'Smith & City/District lines at Barking, engineers were photographed, "gluing ballast stones to prevent future failures". This is a first for me. Is this common practise on raised tracks such as the Barking flyover or is it a new technique being tried out? Martin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 21:00:07 GMT
Installing continuous slab track in the first place will have made better sense - yes it costs twice as much to install, but lasts over sixty years with very low maintenance costs - Hong Kong's MTR used lots of continuous slab track throughout in order to keep maintenance costs down. Read this www.britpave.org.uk/RailWhyBuild.ink
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,761
|
Post by Chris M on Aug 19, 2017 21:28:15 GMT
There are situations where glued ballast is better than slab track - the Dawlish sea wall is one example I know of - but whether that applies to this site I don't know.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 21:49:55 GMT
Not good when you need to change equipment and you get a spinning bolt then it all has to gunned out
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Aug 21, 2017 21:18:29 GMT
Slab track has its own problems - the trackbed design has got to ensure there is no risk of a baseplate touching the reinforcing bar and causing an earth fault on a track circuit, plus there are additional considerations to providing a drainage channel.
Ballasted track is naturally self-draining and presents less of a problem for track circuit operation - plus avoids the issues of gunning out spinning bolts etc!
In response to the OP - I've seen ballast gluing at Paddington NR before - it looks like this is to help preserve the shoulder and hence the trackform.
|
|