Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 17, 2019 23:40:28 GMT
I received this email from TfL earlier this evening:
Does anyone have any additional information (they can share) about what the fault is?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 18, 2019 7:42:57 GMT
A further email this morning:
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 18, 2019 10:29:28 GMT
Tom Edwards on Twitter is reporting (with a photograph) that the issue is cracked coupling plates. (if the tweet fails to load click here) edit: only part of the photo is showing on preview and that part does not include the crack so click the image to see the whole thing
|
|
|
Post by nick66 on Oct 18, 2019 12:15:01 GMT
The Jubilee Line was part suspended this morning due to the temporary unavailability of trains. What was all that about?
|
|
|
Post by SunSeeker on Oct 18, 2019 12:26:14 GMT
Regular safety inspection last night apparently uncovered a problem; cracking in the coupling plate which connects carriages to one another, so a lot of trains have not passed safety test to be in service.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Oct 18, 2019 12:55:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nick66 on Oct 18, 2019 13:04:09 GMT
Thanks for the info, looking at the picture on that thread it all makes perfect sense that they had to check them all, but couldn’t they have been a bit more specific?
|
|
|
Post by sawb on Oct 18, 2019 16:18:15 GMT
Given the similarities between the two stocks, what are the chances this could cause similar problems on the Northern line, or are the components affected different on the two stocks?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,350
|
Post by Colin on Oct 18, 2019 16:33:02 GMT
Northern line stock is not affected.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Oct 18, 2019 16:51:01 GMT
According to an ASLEF mail shot the cracks were on the underframe next to the coupler, they'd checked 45 trains this morning, 27 were okay, 18 had cracks with 18 left to check.
It also said they were checking the 1995s but so far there were no problems.
|
|
|
Post by roman80 on Oct 18, 2019 17:07:26 GMT
According to an ASLEF mail shot the cracks were on the underframe next to the coupler, they'd checked 45 trains this morning, 27 were okay, 18 had cracks with 18 left to check. It also said they were checking the 1995s but so far there were no problems. How difficult and time consuming is the fix on average once the issue is identified?
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Oct 18, 2019 17:37:37 GMT
According to an ASLEF mail shot the cracks were on the underframe next to the coupler, they'd checked 45 trains this morning, 27 were okay, 18 had cracks with 18 left to check. It also said they were checking the 1995s but so far there were no problems. How difficult and time consuming is the fix on average once the issue is identified? Need to find out why it is happening too.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Oct 19, 2019 9:42:56 GMT
According to an ASLEF mail shot the cracks were on the underframe next to the coupler, they'd checked 45 trains this morning, 27 were okay, 18 had cracks with 18 left to check. It also said they were checking the 1995s but so far there were no problems. How difficult and time consuming is the fix on average once the issue is identified? Not a Scooby, I just drive the trains when they tell me to.
|
|
londoner
thinking on '73 stock
Posts: 480
|
Post by londoner on Oct 19, 2019 10:46:02 GMT
What is the purpose of that component in the photo where cracks were identified in several trains?
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Oct 19, 2019 11:17:21 GMT
The cracks are reported to be on the underframe near to the coupler
The underframe is like the chassis on a car
The coupler is what holds the cars together, it a coupler goes then you transform one train into two smaller trains...
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Oct 19, 2019 17:51:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tjw on Oct 19, 2019 18:00:24 GMT
Problems with draw gear are quite common... I suspect that it may have been a inadequate design that is failing after prolonged or heavy use.
At least one type of Met stock (Ashbury) had emergency chains if the coupling bar failed. Having spent quite some time dismantling draw gear prior to repair and reassembly the wear and damage can be quite an eye opener.
Hopefully they are going to check that the brake will apply if the train pulls apart... Sadly supposedly fail safe systems have failed in the past!
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 19, 2019 18:06:33 GMT
Although with distributed power the stresses are less, there are still large forces transmitted through the drawgear. In a locomotive hauled - or propelled - train the force to get the entire train moving was transmitted through the coupling and drawgear between the tender and the leading wagon or carriage, so the drawgear of all rolling stock (since any vehicle could be at the front) had to be enormously strong.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 19, 2019 18:30:38 GMT
The working timetable indicates that the peak requirement is for 58 trains, which is obviously not achievable with a fleet of 54 serviceable trains.
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Oct 19, 2019 20:08:56 GMT
Can trains be reformed to halve the number affected?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 19, 2019 22:53:03 GMT
That will depend (partly) on whether it is just one carriage per train affected. If I've understood things correctly then there is the potential for this to affect both ends of every car (although the outer ends are presumably less likely to be affected).
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Oct 19, 2019 23:08:49 GMT
Because of the way the equipment is distributed throughout the train it would have to be for an identical car, but no reason why not if a quick fix is not identified.
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Oct 20, 2019 11:53:03 GMT
The working timetable indicates that the peak requirement is for 58 trains, which is obviously not achievable with a fleet of 54 serviceable trains. The Jubilee fleet has around 61 or 62 trains, have been retired from the Jubilee line since 2013, Towerman will know the numbers !
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 20, 2019 20:42:47 GMT
There are 62 trains, but 8 are out of service due to the cracked coupling plates leaving 54 available for a 58 train peak service.
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Oct 20, 2019 23:23:55 GMT
There are 62 trains, but 8 are out of service due to the cracked coupling plates leaving 54 available for a 58 train peak service. Expect some peak hours cancellations on Monday 21 October.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Oct 21, 2019 6:15:25 GMT
Jubilee Line twitter 6:14am
Minor delays due to mechanical issues we have identified on a number of our trains.
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Oct 21, 2019 8:07:03 GMT
Jubilee Line twitter 6:14am Minor delays due to mechanical issues we have identified on a number of our trains. 0906 Severe delays ☔️
|
|
|
Post by punkman on Oct 21, 2019 11:44:45 GMT
I've not seen this mentioned here, but I've heard that the problem ONLY relates to the "7th cars;" i.e. the Special trailer cars which were added to the fleet around 2005 / 2006.
That would explain why Northern line trains are not affected, but one would also hope that the four complete new trains delivered at the same time would have been thoroughly checked too.
As an aside and a lay person, it certainly seems that ATO puts more of a stress on trains as the Jubilee line is much more "clunky" and nowhere near as smooth as pre ATO!
|
|
|
Post by underover on Oct 21, 2019 15:06:32 GMT
ATO reduces the life span of a train by an estimated 10 years apparently.
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Oct 21, 2019 18:33:28 GMT
I've not seen this mentioned here, but I've heard that the problem ONLY relates to the "7th cars;" i.e. the Special trailer cars which were added to the fleet around 2005 / 2006. That would explain why Northern line trains are not affected, but one would also hope that the four complete new trains delivered at the same time would have been thoroughly checked too. As an aside and a lay person, it certainly seems that ATO puts more of a stress on trains as the Jubilee line is much more "clunky" and nowhere near as smooth as pre ATO! If only the 7th cars, explains why reformation of units is not an option. I don't think the PEDs work with a mix of 6 and 7 car trains, from a 7-car that slipped out early amongst the 6-car fleet!
|
|